Bio Charger A (Feed) — Pig Farming Field Report

From “how it looks” to business metrics

This report documents differences in pork appearance and changes in farm hygiene observed when pigs from the same dam were divided into a “standard feeding group” and a “Bio Charger A group (0.2% added to feed).” Starting from what can be confirmed in photographs, we aim to connect these observations to numerical and business indicators—carcass results, meat-quality analysis and sales evaluation—in the next stage.

* This report is a record of observations at an actual site. It does not guarantee any effect, and results vary with individual animals and farm conditions.

Premises of the comparison

Flow

How we evaluate

First we check appearance visible in photos (redness of lean, contrast between fat and lean, marbling, slicing uniformity). In the next stage we quantify carcass weight, yield, pH, drip loss, cooking loss, color and taste, and connect them to business indicators such as unit price and grade ratio.

Appearance for sliced products; lean–fat contrast

Appearance findings

• The added group shows relatively clearer continuity of lean layers
• Boundaries with fat are easier to see, giving a tidier look on the tray
• Possible improvement in shelf appearance for sliced belly products

* Photos are an actual example at Kamiya Livestock. These are appearance trends and do not guarantee quality, taste or nutrition. Labels are shown as-is.

Redness of lean; loin-eye appearance

Appearance findings

• The added group shows good redness of lean and a prominent loin eye
• Clear contrast with fat covering gives a higher impression of quality
• Loin is a cut where consumers and buyers easily judge meat quality

* Photos are an actual example at Kamiya Livestock. These are appearance trends and do not guarantee quality, taste or nutrition. Labels are shown as-is.

Marbling appearance; premium-cut appeal

Appearance findings

• The added group shows finer marbling and deeper redness of lean
• The texture characteristic of shoulder loin is easier to see
• Visible appearance differences in high-value cuts help explain product value

* Photos are an actual example at Kamiya Livestock. These are appearance trends and do not guarantee quality, taste or nutrition. Labels are shown as-is.

Four years of continuous use

Kamiya Livestock has used Bio Charger A continuously for four years. We present the very fact of long-term continued use as one indication of ease of use on site.

* These are personal impressions of the farm staff and do not indicate or guarantee any effect. Kamiya Livestock can be introduced as a demonstration farm open to visits.

From appearance findings to numbers and business metrics

The appearance trends seen in the photos suggested differences in items related to in-store appearance (product impression), such as redness of lean, contrast with fat and marbling. However, these are only appearance findings and do not quantitatively indicate quality, taste or nutritional value. Going forward, we plan to quantify carcass results, meat-quality analysis and sales data, and to evaluate including business indicators such as unit price, grade ratio, yield and return rate.

Demonstration test plan (proposal)

• Same farm, same breed, same age: set up a standard group and a Bio A 0.2% group
• Aim for 30+ head per group, repeating across multiple lots if possible
• Record feed intake, weight gain, FCR and incident rate at the same time
• After slaughter, confirm carcass results, meat-quality analysis and sales evaluation together

Next steps

Design a limited-lot trial → quantify carcass results, meat-quality analysis and economic impact.

* This report is a record of a specific demonstration case and does not guarantee any effect. The appearance and observations described vary by individual animal and by farm environment. For final confirmation of prices, ingredients, etc., please contact each product page or the relevant desk.